red 
The rapid progress of artificial intelligence (AI) brings an unseen opportunity for innovation and efficiency. But his progress also allows malicious actors. After our report o Crime that is enabled and in the ecosystem of KryptoassetWe conducted extensive cross-consultations for identifying effective countermeasures and best practices. Our goal was to stop in the emerging threats while in their infancy, while protecting users and useful crypto innovation from harm.
Drawing insights from 40 law enforcement experts, virtual assets (VPP) providers, regulators, technical startups and academic, this report tracking provides detailed best practices adapted for each industry. He describes partial steps that each stakeholder can take to oppose the risks managed by the AI. Below, we draw key findings and practical measures to stay in front of evolving threats.
Problem: AI role in reshaping crypto crimes
- The cry that supports and accelerates: DeepFake fraud, AI-improved illegal goods and services, automated cyberattacks, and other threats and are designed to become mainstream in the next three years. These threats risk significant financial losses and systemic disorders.
- Cooperation cannot be negotiated: No unique entity cannot fight with the crime that is guided. Mutual industrial cooperation, technical companies, and technical companies and law enforcement are critical to avoid irresistible defenses and suffocation of innovations.
- Fighting AI with AI: Organizations must implement the tools to activate AI to detect threats on a scale, while sticking to the Social Media platforms to combat malicious content.
Electrical Threats: How Criminals Exploits AI
In our consultation, we have requested law enforcement officers, experts, regulators, technical entrepreneurs and researchers who have encountered a scale of 1 to 7, evaluation of their current adoption and potential influence. Here are trends that received the highest impact results:
- Attacks with state sponsors: Enemy state actors exploit large language models (LLMS) for reconnaissance, revealing vulnerability and cyber-espionage.
- Executive for deep correctness: Fradsters use videos generated and for false representation of executives and infiltrates Internet meetings, who want to deceive victims of payment.
- DeepFake Crypto Scam: Fraudsters use videos generated and to promote memoas or false crypts. Romantic scammers Now use chatbots and synthetic video calls to manipulate your victims.
- AI-ENHANCENCENCE: Unlaws use marketing materials that generate AI in order to look like false feasural platforms legitimate (eg with the designed image images). “Trading deadlines and” promises unrealistic returns to lure investors.
- Disinformation enabled AI: Malicious actors use AI botnets to generate and spread crypto-associated in social media with misinformation or crook.
Example: Presumed AI Arbitration Crypto Trade Bot Called “Harvest Guard” to pull the carpet later, losing the victims over $ 700,000.
Proactive path forward
Participants showed that many of these risks today exist to some extent. But they will become much prevalent and challenging to find out in the near future. We have a critical but narrowing window of time to act now. Our findings underline the urgency for multiple and coordinated effort to understand and prevent these threats while staying in their relative age.
One participant said that, “Removing the threats of actors that are known to experiment with and should be a priority before they begin to really progress with it.” There is a growing need for stakeholders across the financial, technological and regulatory sector to take proactive measures before these threats become deeply rooted.
Best practices for stakeholders
To counter the risks AI, we have advised participants 18 possible prevention measures that have fallen in one of the five categories:
We have requested participants to assess any measure of 1 (low) to 7 (high) based on their perceived efficiency, monetary and social costs. We found that a balanced approach that includes a range of measures key to maintaining innovation during crime mitigation, regardless of industry.
Different parts of the frame will have different levels of efficiency depending on the industry
Among the specific measures recommended by the participants, several stand out for their potential impact. Ai-analytics enabled and appeared as a key tool for both implementation and implementation of laws for detecting and researching illegal activities on a scale.
Internal business protection are also prominent as important, given the sophistication of enemy state actors who use AI for social engineering. Participants emphasized the need for robust systems for authenticity and employee training to prevent attempts in infiltration that enable AI. One participant said that, “These trends can deal with better training for employees and the use of clear protocols.”
Download the Full Report
The above examples represent only a small sample of a comprehensive prevention framework in detail in the report. From Vapes to the implementation of the Law on the Social Network platforms, this reporting of the report for Crime that is enabled and in the ecosystem of Kryptoasset is a vital resource for stakeholders who want to stay in front of emerging threats. Download the Full Report for all your insights.
